You can theoretically merge the two notations in the same diagram, but personally I find it less readable and would not advise it. The interfaces details are then defined in another more detailed diagram. StarUML Documentation Modeling with Class Diagram StarUML previous page next page Modeling with Class Diagram Top Previous Next The following elements are available in the class diagram. This is very practical when you have no much to say about the interface itself, but want to show what interfaces a class implements (lollipop) or is dependent on (socket). StarUML - Pemrograman Android didasarkan pada perlunya pengenalan salah satu platform mobile OS (Operating System) yang populer saat ini. The circle is in my view better suitable for the lollipop notation of an interface. Especially if you have properties and operations. Maybe I'm old school, but instead of using the circle for the interface, I'd advise for the more conventional interface as with a class box with the keyword «interface» above the name of the interface. Your UML representationįirst of all, I'd like to reinforce Bruno's remark about the difference between generalization (plain line) and realization (dotted line). Example on how to generate class diagram in Visual Studio The. To see how to avoid this side effect, please see our section about modeling tips. NIL staruml lab two: this will cover class diagrams including operations and attributes simple associations and multiplicities aggregation and composition. But if not, it would make sense to allow such interchangeability and replace ISMS and IEmail with a single more general INotification. Class Designer is one of the available components to activate within VS Studio to generate a class diagram representation. Editing of extended model properties can make class diagrams too verbose. But only you can answer this question: If your design requires to keep those communication channels distinct (and maybe your real code adds some differences between the two interfaces), it's fine. The question is however if SMS and email could not be used interchangeably. The decomposition of the interfaces into IStorable and IMessage seems at first sight to be a sound application of interface segregation principle.Ĭombining the two interfaces into a reusable ISMS interface instead of directly implementing them in a concrete SMS class will in this regard keep your code more maintainable, since it will easily allow to replace the SMS implementation with an alternative one (which makes sense if you consider that SMS functionality can be platform specific). I have a couple of remarks on top of Bruno's already very clear answer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |